0030208: "not" doesn't work properly on bitpacked booleans

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

0030208: "not" doesn't work properly on bitpacked booleans

Luca Olivetti-2
I was going to report a bug but I see it's already fixed
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=30208
however it's still there in 3.0.4, released a year and a half later than
the fix.
Will the fix be backported/merged to the next 3.0.6?
For the time being I have to use fpc 2.6.4, but that's not optimal.

Bye
--
Luca

_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  [hidden email]
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 0030208: "not" doesn't work properly on bitpacked booleans

Luca Olivetti-2
El 03/04/18 a les 13:14, Luca Olivetti ha escrit:
> I was going to report a bug but I see it's already fixed
> https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=30208
> however it's still there in 3.0.4, released a year and a half later than
> the fix.
> Will the fix be backported/merged to the next 3.0.6?
> For the time being I have to use fpc 2.6.4, but that's not optimal.

No comment?

Bye
--
Luca

_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  [hidden email]
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 0030208: "not" doesn't work properly on bitpacked booleans

wkitty42
On 04/05/2018 02:11 PM, Luca Olivetti wrote:
> El 03/04/18 a les 13:14, Luca Olivetti ha escrit:
>> I was going to report a bug but I see it's already fixed
>> https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=30208
>> however it's still there in 3.0.4, released a year and a half later than the fix.
>> Will the fix be backported/merged to the next 3.0.6?
>> For the time being I have to use fpc 2.6.4, but that's not optimal.
>
> No comment?


it has only been 1.5 to 2.0 days ;)


--
  NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
        *Please keep mailing list traffic on the list unless*
        *a signed and pre-paid contract is in effect with us.*
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  [hidden email]
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 0030208: "not" doesn't work properly on bitpacked booleans

Luca Olivetti-2
El 06/04/18 a les 00:06, [hidden email] ha escrit:

> On 04/05/2018 02:11 PM, Luca Olivetti wrote:
>> El 03/04/18 a les 13:14, Luca Olivetti ha escrit:
>>> I was going to report a bug but I see it's already fixed
>>> https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=30208
>>> however it's still there in 3.0.4, released a year and a half later
>>> than the fix.
>>> Will the fix be backported/merged to the next 3.0.6?
>>> For the time being I have to use fpc 2.6.4, but that's not optimal.
>>
>> No comment?
>
>
> it has only been 1.5 to 2.0 days ;)

Maybe I should change the subject to "COOL NEW LOGO!!!!"
;-)

Bye
--
Luca

_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  [hidden email]
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal